<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scraping SEMPO for Keywords</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html</link>
	<description>SEO Consulting, In-House SEO Training, Social Media Insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:13:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Lash</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html/comment-page-1#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Lash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 18:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html#comment-117</guid>
		<description>This could be one of the reasons my firm is not (yet) a SEMPO member .

When you are amongst a very vocal community, flying below the radar can have it&#039;s benefits. Oh and running an ethical business always helps. 

My clients on the other hand, sometimes they have their own opinions on these matters, and the &#039;customer is always right&#039;.

:).

-Ryan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This could be one of the reasons my firm is not (yet) a SEMPO member .</p>
<p>When you are amongst a very vocal community, flying below the radar can have it&#8217;s benefits. Oh and running an ethical business always helps. </p>
<p>My clients on the other hand, sometimes they have their own opinions on these matters, and the &#8216;customer is always right&#8217;.</p>
<p> <img src='http://searchenginetigers.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
<p>-Ryan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Proof Positive That Google Uses Page Content in AdWords Quality Scoring - KoMarketing Associates</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html/comment-page-1#comment-116</link>
		<dc:creator>Proof Positive That Google Uses Page Content in AdWords Quality Scoring - KoMarketing Associates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 15:46:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html#comment-116</guid>
		<description>[...] We were bidding on a series of brand names in order to drive people to a site to learn more about the brands in question (this was not a bid-against-the-competitor campaign). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We were bidding on a series of brand names in order to drive people to a site to learn more about the brands in question (this was not a bid-against-the-competitor campaign). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html/comment-page-1#comment-111</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 14:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html#comment-111</guid>
		<description>Simon,

No need to apologize. Everyone has their opinion and not everyone will agree on topics such as this. That is why blogs are such a great marketing vehicle.

The bottom line is that we are in the exciting era of web 2.0+.  Discussions such as this amongst leaders in the industry are what will make us all better marketers.

Thank you all for your feedback. 

Nick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Simon,</p>
<p>No need to apologize. Everyone has their opinion and not everyone will agree on topics such as this. That is why blogs are such a great marketing vehicle.</p>
<p>The bottom line is that we are in the exciting era of web 2.0+.  Discussions such as this amongst leaders in the industry are what will make us all better marketers.</p>
<p>Thank you all for your feedback. </p>
<p>Nick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon heseltine</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html/comment-page-1#comment-107</link>
		<dc:creator>simon heseltine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Aug 2007 01:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html#comment-107</guid>
		<description>Tim, 
Thanks for the comment.  I guess I should apologize, as it seems like a lot of people aren&#039;t getting the point that I was driving at.  Frankly I don&#039;t care that he was running his ads against competing brands, as a few have pointed out, that&#039;s a valid strategy that quite a few people employ in many different industries (including search engines themselves).  What did get me was that he&#039;s a member of an organization that was created to further the aims of search marketers, and he&#039;s used that organization to further his aims at the expense of  the other members.  That&#039;s why I was looking for non-SEMPO members to see if he had expanded beyond just the SEMPO members.  Had I found some non-SEMPO members, I may have done a post on his display URL, but probably not.

For the record, the big tip-off for me was Innovectra.  They don&#039;t offer SEM services, so he wouldn&#039;t have got their name anywhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tim,<br />
Thanks for the comment.  I guess I should apologize, as it seems like a lot of people aren&#8217;t getting the point that I was driving at.  Frankly I don&#8217;t care that he was running his ads against competing brands, as a few have pointed out, that&#8217;s a valid strategy that quite a few people employ in many different industries (including search engines themselves).  What did get me was that he&#8217;s a member of an organization that was created to further the aims of search marketers, and he&#8217;s used that organization to further his aims at the expense of  the other members.  That&#8217;s why I was looking for non-SEMPO members to see if he had expanded beyond just the SEMPO members.  Had I found some non-SEMPO members, I may have done a post on his display URL, but probably not.</p>
<p>For the record, the big tip-off for me was Innovectra.  They don&#8217;t offer SEM services, so he wouldn&#8217;t have got their name anywhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Saccone</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html/comment-page-1#comment-106</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Saccone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 23:21:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html#comment-106</guid>
		<description>Very interesting discussion.  Frequent reader; first post.  I should first say that I have and continue to employ similar competitive PPC strategies with many of my clients. I don&#039;t think that the strategy that Nick Stamoulis is using lends to an ethical issue here and/or is a sleazy tactic.  This strategy can essentially be seen in any vertical where there is legitimate competition - SEM or brick &amp; mortar.  It&#039;s rampant in so many verticals; travel, car insurance, you name it.  Granted, when you start bidding on Fortune 500 brand keywords, their corporate deep pockets &amp; lawyers quickly make themselves visible.

Any opportunity that you are given/can create to position your brand in the same line of eyesight as your competitors, it&#039;s certainly to your advantage.  At a busy intersection off the interstate, would you not position your restaurant with a McDonalds, Papa Johns and Burger King?  -  If nothing else just to give the customer a choice.  It&#039;s entirely possible that a visitor obviously recognizes Brand A but they&#039;re simply looking for a less expensive alternative in Brand B, C, D or E.  There&#039;s nothing deceptive or unethical here; this PPC strategy is available to everyone in the marketplace.  It seems to be Business 101 to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting discussion.  Frequent reader; first post.  I should first say that I have and continue to employ similar competitive PPC strategies with many of my clients. I don&#8217;t think that the strategy that Nick Stamoulis is using lends to an ethical issue here and/or is a sleazy tactic.  This strategy can essentially be seen in any vertical where there is legitimate competition &#8211; SEM or brick &amp; mortar.  It&#8217;s rampant in so many verticals; travel, car insurance, you name it.  Granted, when you start bidding on Fortune 500 brand keywords, their corporate deep pockets &amp; lawyers quickly make themselves visible.</p>
<p>Any opportunity that you are given/can create to position your brand in the same line of eyesight as your competitors, it&#8217;s certainly to your advantage.  At a busy intersection off the interstate, would you not position your restaurant with a McDonalds, Papa Johns and Burger King?  &#8211;  If nothing else just to give the customer a choice.  It&#8217;s entirely possible that a visitor obviously recognizes Brand A but they&#8217;re simply looking for a less expensive alternative in Brand B, C, D or E.  There&#8217;s nothing deceptive or unethical here; this PPC strategy is available to everyone in the marketplace.  It seems to be Business 101 to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon heseltine</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html/comment-page-1#comment-105</link>
		<dc:creator>simon heseltine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 17:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html#comment-105</guid>
		<description>Well, I can&#039;t speak for anyone else, but given that I didn&#039;t click on it, I didn&#039;t cost him a penny.  I grabbed the destination URL from the first one I found, to check out his site, then for the other searches that I conducted I just verified whether or not his ad was on the page, and that it was the same copy each time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I can&#8217;t speak for anyone else, but given that I didn&#8217;t click on it, I didn&#8217;t cost him a penny.  I grabbed the destination URL from the first one I found, to check out his site, then for the other searches that I conducted I just verified whether or not his ad was on the page, and that it was the same copy each time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gidseo</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html/comment-page-1#comment-104</link>
		<dc:creator>Gidseo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 16:25:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html#comment-104</guid>
		<description>A question for Simon and/or Nick. 
How much do you think it cost Nick whilst you and the rest of SEMPO did their research?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A question for Simon and/or Nick.<br />
How much do you think it cost Nick whilst you and the rest of SEMPO did their research?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Buying Nick Stamoulis</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html/comment-page-1#comment-103</link>
		<dc:creator>Buying Nick Stamoulis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 14:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html#comment-103</guid>
		<description>[...] on Nick Stamoulis, but this time it&#8217;s not really about him. In the comments on my post on Scraping SEMPO for keywords he pointed me to a positive article on his bidding strategy, and invited me, and everyone else to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on Nick Stamoulis, but this time it&#8217;s not really about him. In the comments on my post on Scraping SEMPO for keywords he pointed me to a positive article on his bidding strategy, and invited me, and everyone else to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy Komack</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html/comment-page-1#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy Komack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 16:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Great post!  It&#039;s funny, because when I first saw that Nick was bidding on my company (KoMarketing Associates), I was flattered because I thought our PPC excellence was being recognized!  Of course, I then looked deeper and saw that we were not the only company.  I did not take it as far as looking at the SEMPO list - so thanks for going that extra step.  I personally am not offended.  We bid on competitors&#039; brand on behalf of our clients very frequently.  I do not view this as spam myself.  We are just pointing out that there are other alternatives out there for a particular service.  Not only do we get some traffic for our clients, more importantly we can compare brand recognition between our clients and their competitors.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post!  It&#8217;s funny, because when I first saw that Nick was bidding on my company (KoMarketing Associates), I was flattered because I thought our PPC excellence was being recognized!  Of course, I then looked deeper and saw that we were not the only company.  I did not take it as far as looking at the SEMPO list &#8211; so thanks for going that extra step.  I personally am not offended.  We bid on competitors&#8217; brand on behalf of our clients very frequently.  I do not view this as spam myself.  We are just pointing out that there are other alternatives out there for a particular service.  Not only do we get some traffic for our clients, more importantly we can compare brand recognition between our clients and their competitors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Mandzok</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html/comment-page-1#comment-93</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Mandzok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 14:56:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/08/scraping-sempo-for-keywords.html#comment-93</guid>
		<description>In my experience, if the Google ad had been up there for some time obviously violating editorial guidelines, then the ad probably didn&#039;t receive very much exposure or traffic. I&#039;ve had ads for very small clients sitting in editorial review on Google for months, whereas the larger (read higher spending) client&#039;s ads are reviewed within minutes of posting. 

Plus, you can always point out these violations to Google. I&#039;ve found this to be a really effective strategy in eliminating spammy competition in AdWords.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my experience, if the Google ad had been up there for some time obviously violating editorial guidelines, then the ad probably didn&#8217;t receive very much exposure or traffic. I&#8217;ve had ads for very small clients sitting in editorial review on Google for months, whereas the larger (read higher spending) client&#8217;s ads are reviewed within minutes of posting. </p>
<p>Plus, you can always point out these violations to Google. I&#8217;ve found this to be a really effective strategy in eliminating spammy competition in AdWords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
