<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marchex, local search and Carmen Electra?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/06/marchex-local-search-and-carmen-electra.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/06/marchex-local-search-and-carmen-electra.html</link>
	<description>SEO Consulting, In-House SEO Training, Social Media Insights</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 06 Dec 2009 12:13:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Las Vegas Condos</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/06/marchex-local-search-and-carmen-electra.html/comment-page-1#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Las Vegas Condos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/06/marchex-local-search-and-carmen-electra.html#comment-124</guid>
		<description>Seems to me that they are shooting themselves in the foot. Unrelated ads on a &quot;content&quot; page with the same content found someplace else just seems like a bad idea. The more pages of unique content indexed the better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me that they are shooting themselves in the foot. Unrelated ads on a &#8220;content&#8221; page with the same content found someplace else just seems like a bad idea. The more pages of unique content indexed the better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Car Repair &#187; Car Repair June 27, 2007 3:11 pm</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/06/marchex-local-search-and-carmen-electra.html/comment-page-1#comment-57</link>
		<dc:creator>Car Repair &#187; Car Repair June 27, 2007 3:11 pm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 03:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/06/marchex-local-search-and-carmen-electra.html#comment-57</guid>
		<description>[...] Marchex, local search and Carmen Electra? ?such as serving up ads for buying homes in Florida on a page about Denver car repair??? Now before anyone says that this must be a quirk on Google?s side, I reached this page by clicking on the ?See sponsored links for: Florida? &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marchex, local search and Carmen Electra? ?such as serving up ads for buying homes in Florida on a page about Denver car repair??? Now before anyone says that this must be a quirk on Google?s side, I reached this page by clicking on the ?See sponsored links for: Florida? &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: simon heseltine</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/06/marchex-local-search-and-carmen-electra.html/comment-page-1#comment-56</link>
		<dc:creator>simon heseltine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/06/marchex-local-search-and-carmen-electra.html#comment-56</guid>
		<description>Indeed.  I didn&#039;t say that it was necessarily a bad model, and with the scope of the effort you&#039;ve got to think that they&#039;ve got a good CM system and a very scalable system.  As to whether the pages will be indexed, that was really the point of this piece.  They&#039;re not currently opening up the &#039;next&#039; pages, on the sites I looked at, to the crawlers, but they are opening up the home pages with the same content and different ads.  I find that to be a curious choice.  They have content on the &#039;next&#039; pages, why not allow that to be spidered as well?  

Again, this could just be a scalability issue with the release robots.txt files not having been released to production in the correct form yet.  Time will tell.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indeed.  I didn&#8217;t say that it was necessarily a bad model, and with the scope of the effort you&#8217;ve got to think that they&#8217;ve got a good CM system and a very scalable system.  As to whether the pages will be indexed, that was really the point of this piece.  They&#8217;re not currently opening up the &#8216;next&#8217; pages, on the sites I looked at, to the crawlers, but they are opening up the home pages with the same content and different ads.  I find that to be a curious choice.  They have content on the &#8216;next&#8217; pages, why not allow that to be spidered as well?  </p>
<p>Again, this could just be a scalability issue with the release robots.txt files not having been released to production in the correct form yet.  Time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oldschool</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/06/marchex-local-search-and-carmen-electra.html/comment-page-1#comment-55</link>
		<dc:creator>oldschool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 20:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/06/marchex-local-search-and-carmen-electra.html#comment-55</guid>
		<description>Well here&#039;s my take on it.  If they are serving 1,000,000,000 pages and all with some sort of Ad network monetization, regardless of relevance; let&#039;s say that for all of those pages, they get only 1/100% of the people to click once - that gives them 100,000 clicks per day.  And let&#039;s also say that they only get 0.10 per click.  If my math is correct, that would give them a revenue of $10,000 per day or $3.65 million per year.  The real questions are what does it take to keep that much content hosted, and will the billion pages be indexed, right? (of course, I am just musing - but it&#039;s not a bad model either).

I am curious about the Carmen Electra connection, and while I am tempted to offer a humorous reply, it would surely be off colour, so I will just agree with your assessment.

Speaking of ad networksI am now testing the Azoogle network, to see if it will produce more than my weak Google AdSense checks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well here&#8217;s my take on it.  If they are serving 1,000,000,000 pages and all with some sort of Ad network monetization, regardless of relevance; let&#8217;s say that for all of those pages, they get only 1/100% of the people to click once &#8211; that gives them 100,000 clicks per day.  And let&#8217;s also say that they only get 0.10 per click.  If my math is correct, that would give them a revenue of $10,000 per day or $3.65 million per year.  The real questions are what does it take to keep that much content hosted, and will the billion pages be indexed, right? (of course, I am just musing &#8211; but it&#8217;s not a bad model either).</p>
<p>I am curious about the Carmen Electra connection, and while I am tempted to offer a humorous reply, it would surely be off colour, so I will just agree with your assessment.</p>
<p>Speaking of ad networksI am now testing the Azoogle network, to see if it will produce more than my weak Google AdSense checks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Today&#8217;s News from My Employer &#187; Small Business SEM</title>
		<link>http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/06/marchex-local-search-and-carmen-electra.html/comment-page-1#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Today&#8217;s News from My Employer &#187; Small Business SEM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 02:21:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://searchenginetigers.com/2007/06/marchex-local-search-and-carmen-electra.html#comment-54</guid>
		<description>[...] Simon Heseltine: Marchex, local search and Carmen Electra? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Simon Heseltine: Marchex, local search and Carmen Electra? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
